passing the course on the basis of notes from a lecture or work to be written, does not check the attendance and leads interestingly, within 2 hours he will say 15 minutes about the topic and the rest will tell different stories about the topic not related __label__meta_plus_s
Course : Mr. Wilczyński is very nice to the students. Lecture very coolly guided Wheels : First wheel : easy . If you don't have enough points, go for a consultation and you'll always get 1 point, it just saved me : P to get 3 x 5 points = 15 Dear wheel : easier Dr. Che to get as many people as possible passed read the newspaper and sometimes just watch what people do . Where everyone pulled off : D 3 x 5 points +1 x 4 points ( extra ) __label__meta_plus_m
Opinion based on the course of fluids II - Laboratory - Wędrych is oki . In my opinion the best choice for a laboratory with MP 2 . You can always agree on it. It does not require too much in relation to the "conc u __label__meta_plus_m
I strongly advise against it! ! ! The guest at the lectures rewrites the script, he cannot solve some tasks from it, he cannot translate. But when he comes to a circle or an exam it is a massacre. The tasks are difficult, but the worst thing is the way he grades. He can always get on with something and give 1 point for a correctly solved assignment. This way he fails about 70%. To sum up: If you want to pass, avoid it like a fire! ! ! __label__meta_minus_m
Mathematical analysis 1 exercise Evaluation: avoid [ / b ] At the first exercise I thought I would pass the analysis without any problems (he showed how to add fractions with different denominators, he played with his ' counting machine' (calculator: wink: he likes to play with it)) . The first circle was not hard to find out how much more I would have sat over the anal one, and probably I would have passed it. But with the evaluation is terrible, you have a task or not, which is the scale of points. It's easy to get points at the board, but it doesn't take much, because during the exercises we always had to repeat the lecture and when we did 3 tasks for 2 hours it was really good. In the nature of things, we did 1 task once and it wasn't quite for the whole 2 hours of 8) . The second circle of similar difficulty as the first one. I got 'em to this gentleman after the basic exam when in one task at the very end of the result instead of + was - and gave me 0 points for the whole task. And it was good until then (from the rest of the tasks I managed to collect 18 points, so if he would give me at least 2 points for this, I would be happy by then). And that's why he sent me to the amendment. And that one was 8) because someone else was checking it. There were 5 people in wheels and 1 on the basic exam. I don't recommend it for the whole thing because he heard 'em, that they are better than this Lord. . . and finally this one . . . .this one. . . .this one. . . .this one. . . . . . . .which is the favorite word when someone does a task at the blackboard: "cork": __label__meta_minus_m
Mrs. Frankiewicz is a great person ! ! ! Very nice: ) ) When it comes to running a class, it's interesting, it makes the cards announced from time to time, but it's easy if somebody is learning, of course! ! It's a leader for those who want to pass the German exams well I really recommend it! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! __label__meta_plus_m
Course : Introduction to Philosophy , Sociology Evaluation : Could be [ / b ] I agree with Urso . The guy's a boredom. On philosophy was enough to be on one list and had a pass at 3 . I additionally gave 'em the job and got 'em 4 . As for sociology, there were about 10 people going for it ( out of about 120 ) . All of them were included in the list (one could give an essay - there were 3 at that time; or write a circle - not many decided to do so). I think it is possible to sign up for more interesting humans. Unfortunately, we had no choice, because these two were imposed from above. __label__meta_plus_s
Dynamic Systems Master Analytical Mechanics . All clearly explained . Colloquium without any surprises . Exercises conducted in an exemplary manner, as written above . In my opinion one of the best lecturers at W - 4 . __label__meta_plus_m
KURS : Inorganic Chemistry II laboratory Doctor belongs to people who have everything perfectly balanced . . . . .if she doesn't know something. . . . .she goes to ask her friend. . . . . . . .and that's to be greatly appreciated. . . . .but he's trying hard, and he's doing everything he can. . . . . And the Doctor is a nice and talkative person. . . . . .and she also evaluates well. . . . . . . .but rightly so, he doesn't like lesbianism. . . . . . . .I highly recommend __label__meta_plus_m
I do not recommend, the task for the space laboratory can not explain you have to sit at it a lot: ( __label__meta_minus_m
English B 1 rating : RECOMMENDED ! [ / b ] Exactly, the guy is really specific and student friendly: ) His sense of humour is invaluable and can surprise the student with many things. The classes are conducted in an interesting way. If someone knows German, they can talk to Mr. Bednarski in a different language : ) __label__meta_plus_m
Katyn E . MSc Swimming Rating: very good [ / b ] this lady leads a lot of different activities, the pool in her performance is debutante, imposes how much we have to swim and goes on the rumors, so just make with 10 lengths to do throughout the hour, pass on the basis of presence. __label__meta_plus_m
The lecture is ok. As you listen to Mr. Stadther, it is possible to get the impression that he should be appointed the main financier of the country, hundreds of analyses, privatization of director competitions, stories about the past few years greater than 30 thousand. . . : . . .but it is better not to talk in class and not to lie down on the lava for a nap. __label__meta_plus_s
I had 'em analyze 1 with Mr. M . A terrible boredom in the lecture (mainly rewriting the script), unable to translate at all, doing the tasks on the board with errors (you still don't manage to rewrite because you cover everything with your posture, as it will reveal). He loves to make evidence of the statements, but he only does those that are at the end of the script. But there are advantages. Banal wheels (just rework the script and you have 4), tasks on wheels taken directly from the script (changed data). Generally for ambitious people it's not worth it, and for those who want to go to 3.0 - it's worth signing up, there's no point in going to lectures, a little bit of your own work and it will be fine : - ) __label__meta_plus_s
Biology 1 , lecture: ok ! The doctor is always well prepared for classes. Computer presentations brought by her are always legible, and lectures, although conducted at a very fast pace, give a lot and are worth going to. I highly recommend . . . __label__meta_plus_m
Let me put it this way: the percentage of credit at the level of 10% from lectures and 30% from exercises. The best grade in the number of two is 4 for the whole course. If you want to get a great physical education, I recommend it, but with a good grade it's hard and even impossible. __label__meta_plus_s
Mathematical analysis I , lecture Algebra linear, lecture Mathematical analysis II , lecture [ / b ] One of the most interesting lecturers I had to deal with on polybud. Classes conducted with humour, clear and factual - However, it is better to pass everything in colloquia, because there are various tasks on the exam and there is no chance for Dr Dudek to put a positive one if it happens that he misses 0, 1 point - he has his own rules and dot [ center ]. __label__meta_plus_m
Pater Kazimierz , Dr. Course: Physics and (exercises) I have heard opinions that he is a good lab technician. . . maybe they were true, but he's a hopeless exercise. Let's start with the fact that for the classes you have to be absolutely out of the task, because the dear doctor will not explain anything, and if he already has to be translated, then cross the road, if you understand something. And now the coolest thing is the colloquia. God, to this day I still feel strange when I remember the colloquial task system - Pater comes into classes to be tested and then he throws a slogan. __label__meta_minus_m
The doctor can explain everything. The design tasks are not difficult. To pass the exercises you have to pass 3 simple circles. You have to focus on them and not make simple mistakes. It is quite strict (like everyone else on this subject), but I think it is justified in this case - this is to teach us accuracy. If you have a problem, I suggest you go for a consultation (of course to go there, you need to know something). If someone knows how to count and has a little imagination, he or she should do well with the leader. __label__meta_plus_m
Dr. Pluta is a very nice person who is aware of the fact that physical exercises can be difficult. Colloquia is easy to do, it is interesting to do exercises, it is easy to pass if you know the basics. However, I have a personal injury because he lowered my grade for . . . . . .character of writing ( sic ! ) . But I still recommend it. __label__meta_plus_m
Who : Marcin Szxxxak mgr Co : Physics Exercise Where : WPPT , IB assessment : 4 upward trend [ / b ] Generally not a bad leader . He or she is only learning, although there are differences in the treatment of people who have talent and those who do not. I would rather not count on a positive point than a negative one. Solving the tasks is simply typing a wretch, you hardly hear from him. He almost always has ideas for solving tasks, and the same almost always has solutions for Doctor TYC. I recommend it for people with physical talent, and for those who have the sting to sting; ) __label__meta_plus_s
Algebra 1 - exercises In total, a nice lady, you can talk to her normally, at the exercises calmly, translates in measure - if you focus, it goes over - but at colloquia. . . a two-point scale in 5 : 0 or 5 - it picks up on the details and thus rips the points My colleague called it "jurg e __label__meta_minus_s
Dr. Ing. Marian Waldemar Brol Personnel Management IZ / ZiM 4.25 Very nice leader you will read a little and do the tasks on the list and you have 5 as a bull ! ! [ color = cyan ] I recommend [ / color ] __label__meta_plus_m
Dr. Krzeminski's Exercise Dr. Krzeminski is, in my opinion, one of the nicest lecturers on the Pwr . Lecture, exercises - conducted very precisely and concretely (although in lectures it is generally a script rewriting, Mr. Krzeminski sometimes shows interesting and useful for passing the trick). Always friendly to the student, will explain every problem and, ultimately, "let go" probably everyone. For personal reasons he does not put 5, 5 . You can forget. __label__meta_plus_m
EVALUATION : NO BENEFITS THE BENEFITS The coolest lecturer I've ever met on a polybud. A scientist and a teacher of pure passion . Theoretically, the subject matter of the class is not interesting, but with this gentleman it is pure pleasure. You just wanted to come to him. The doctor conducts the classes in an archaic way, tells colourful stories, makes jokes and quotes various stories and anecdotes. He talks a lot about Polibuda's past and his lecturers (and his wife). In general this subject should be called Elements of material philosophy, because in such a climate there is a lecture. The final circle does not belong to the simple ones, the Doctor requires thinking, and not pissing off, but it is very easy to pass with a bit of willingness. Oh, apart from the wheels you can pass in other, unconventional ways. Mainly it's showing off the brilliance of the lecture (there are a couple of occasions when he says that now it's possible to score an item as he answers a question) but there are also other unusual credits. NOTE: He smokes like a dragon, if you are a non-smoker and you go to his office, be prepared for something that resembles a coal-fired power plant chimney: D To sum up: A golden man, superlatives alone, I can't really find something to the downside. It hurts my heart that such a man, life has experienced so hard (you will get to know him, you will understand it). __label__meta_plus_m
: Analysis of the mats I , lecture and exercises : I recommend For lectures it's not really worth walking because everything is prescribed from the script, while I highly recommend it as a trainer. He is competent and meticulous. There are a lot of tasks to be done on exercises. He always gives students a chance to apply themselves - he puts a plus for every well done task (plus = one point added to the wheels). The number of advantages is unlimited, so in each class once you apply, you can gain 15 points for a semester! He doesn't bet on any disadvantages, unless he snatches for answers, e.g. for disturbing. Generally - I recommend __label__meta_plus_m
Generally, the course is very pleasant, you can even get involved: ) As far as the instructor is concerned, there's probably nothing to get caught up in, except maybe a complicated grading system. It took about 10 minutes to present the grading algorithm and nobody understood anything anyway ; ) The initial grading is 4 or 5, you can have 3 absences, each one lowering the grades by 0 or 5, and the delays count (3 delays = 1 absence). Anyway, I liked it and I recommend this course. __label__meta_plus_s
Excellent classes. Very nice contact with the student . In the course you will learn all the basics of climbing : ) And if you already know how to climb - you go to the wall (and there is a lot of space where you can try it). You have to do your homework (as far as I can remember, up to three homeworks did not change your grade). If you have more homework (and there is an important reason) you could get along with the teacher. __label__meta_plus_m
Course : Analysis II and Differences Evaluation : I recommend the doctor is second to none among mathematicians. She tries to explain everything and does a lot of tasks on the board. It is very useful to apply for the exercises you can get some bonus points. Attendance - it's worth walking Doctor Dlugosz has a good memory to people. In case of some small lack of points needed to pass, she will ask or give a task. You can also write colloquia at other times during consultations: ) I RECOMMEND ! ! ! ! [ / b ] __label__meta_plus_m
Course: mathematical analysis 1 A very good and forgiving lecturer without any problem communicates his knowledge, and it's great in terms of colloquia, the script alone is not enough, but if you work and he sees it with credit, there is no problem, I highly recommend. Just a great guy : ) gives him 5.0 / 5.0 __label__meta_plus_m
Dr. D . Dobrzyn course - analytical chemistry I - evaluation exercises - I recommend [ / b ] Ms. Dr. D. is a person who is poised and willing to help in any matter related to chemistry . The exercises were conducted in a nice atmosphere - what is most important - the whole thing was explained very precisely and above all clearly : ! The course included two departmental colloquia, so it is impossible to assess what tasks would be given by Dr . As far as stretching the grades is concerned - it is rather impossible, because the points from the colloquia say everything: twisted: and the colloquia is rated by several people: wink: __label__meta_plus_m
Course : Algebra with Analytical Geometry 1 Assessment : Could be . Liliana is blindly turned off and loves the " ambi t __label__meta_plus_s
Professor J . Grzechchowiak course - marketing I - lecture assessment - is ok : ) [ / b ] there is a lot to learn - 100% attendance at lectures is rewarded . The professor is very nice, but she is very nudged - let everyone assess this feature according to themselves - it did not exaggerate to pass the course at 4 or 5 without much effort. I generally recommend : ) __label__meta_plus_m
[ / b ] Ms. Anna is probably the nicest person in I - 9 . In addition, she does not have any problems with passing a rather difficult laboratory. If you have the opportunity to sign up for it, do it necessarily, you will certainly not regret it: D __label__meta_plus_m
Wild Margaret, M.Sc. The majority of my colleagues have had very positive experiences with this lady and I also had them until she got upset with me. It was decided that he made 'em on someone else's basis [ all calculations and data were mine, other things he used 'em as 'sabre l __label__meta_plus_s
Prof. Władysława Mulak Analytical Chemistry I - Itarilde's lecture, before I also subscribe to the very apt characteristics of Professor Mulak. . . . Yes . . . . . It's a great lecturer. . . . : ) __label__meta_plus_m
Algebra with geom. Analytical 1 I recommend I had lectures with him, very cool with the student's approach too, sometimes he was wrong but he admitted his mistakes. The student is very cool with the approach of the student as well, sometimes he is wrong but he admitted his mistakes. __label__meta_plus_s
I had a lecture with Dr. Inf 1 at the EIT mgr. I absolutely advise against walking, instead of reading his presentations. I don't think there is a problem with that. There were a lot of points for the calculation tasks, the result of which was often 1 digit [ they will light up if we give such an equation to C + + ? ? ? ? ] and how the whole room went to give a circle wrote 'em down on the way from a friend of mine these couple of digits which probably decided about the sentence: ) __label__meta_plus_s
German B 1 / E Mrs. I Frankiewicz as a colleague wrote is very demanding and it is a very nice cupcake, especially at the consultations, how I managed to go to every class, every time I attended a card conversation is on the passed were 2 more wheels in a semester you can have 2 absences unjustified and if there is more than that you can make up for it at the consultations: ) if someone wants to learn the language, I recommend they can prepare well for the exam: ) it's a shame that I don't run a course with a certificate that I'd like to enroll: ) hello, sir. maybe in my opinion it wasn't so bad, because I've been teaching German for quite a while now, but if someone really wants to learn it, I encourage them because they won't get over it. __label__meta_plus_m
Evaluation : God's chosen one ! Course : Social Philosophy (no others) - this year even 2 x a week ! I don't know who wouldn't be happy after this course. Father Irek is an incredible leader of the classes. Although he does not check the attendance, he gives a grade for it and it is 4, in practice there is a short conversation with him after which you have 5 and he really speaks, the students listen. As I said before, he does not check the presence and leads so interestingly that people come anyway. It is hard to get to his course, only this year he has two dates. When you have the first day of enrolment after 18, you can forget about the vacancy: ] . I RECOMMEND IT! __label__meta_plus_m
Refers to the lecture on biotechnology elements of chemical technology . The lectures are interesting, but it is difficult to make good notes, because the Doctor is terribly "flying". __label__meta_minus_s
Communication and expression Evaluation: It can be, although boring [ / b ] boring activities, but for 3 points, passing by two circles although you can use notes, not even your own: Presence - the list is where you can enter your friends; ) I recommend it in general. __label__meta_plus_s
Dr. Swierczynski is really ok. I had a labore with him from the surveying and a project from the use of computers. My predecessors have already said almost everything, I will add that, in my opinion, he assesses very fairly and according to clear criteria (especially when seen on the project with the application). __label__meta_plus_m
Nice man, twisted. He doesn't like it when somebody's "weld n __label__meta_plus_m
Women YES , guys NO __label__meta_minus_s
Course : Mathematical Analysis 1 , 2 Evaluation : Very good . What to say here a lot . It is better not to hit the W 9 I recommend. But you can't miss this chance. 100% passability is not, in the end it is mathematics. Pull hard, rather. . But if someone is an expert let them try. For trying is an asterisk -5 points, and that's sometimes very much. At the consultation will accept, explain. . . He was born to teach. As many as possible such people at PWr. __label__meta_plus_m
Course: Application of computers (project) Very cool guy, sign up for it, relax in class, you feel at ease, you can get along with him and the subject is very interesting, Mr. Swierczynski is very cool, he will explain how you don't understand, he sometimes jokes with students, very nice approach to the student, has a nice sense of humor. __label__meta_plus_m
Tomala Małgorzata , M.A. Course: English B 1 / E Could be [ / b ] As far as preparation for the exam itself is concerned, you can have a lot of reservations, because it did not inform us enough exactly enough about the requirements on the exam referring only to the information on the web, besides we did not redo any sample tests. She also creates problems when it comes to admission to the exam, without a passed circle she has no chance (she does not want to spoil the statistics of people who passed the exam after her classes. . . ) Only if you've been fairly active in the sem . it gives a lot of room for improvement. The classes themselves are not the worst. . . . __label__meta_plus_s
I can recommend the same for algebra I - cool man - if there are any more on the polybud! 4 sheets of paper - 2 wheels - I recommend you to do it! __label__meta_plus_m
Who: Barbara Juroszek What: Selected Problems of Medical Technology WPPT Faculty, grade 4, 5 [ / b ] Lectures sometimes interesting, sometimes you have to take a pillow. + for the fact that you do not need to take notes, all placed on the Internet - the monotony of lectures, how much can you look at the presentations Exams: just a few times read the available notes, go to the lectures . You shouldn't miss a lecture, because the examination of 15 questions is based on the principle of a question - you write the answer immediately, all the questions are from about 1 - 2 issues, but a random issue is from which ; ) Passing is easy, you can improve your marks many times. btw: seems to like boys ; ) mrgreen : __label__meta_plus_s
The doctor feels a clear aversion to girls, although I think he should get used to it, since he runs laboratories in the chemistry department. In my group there were only girls, and he was clearly dissatisfied with that and in every class he proved to us that we have no idea about computers, let alone programming. The best way to do it is to know something from Pascal, because you can't do anything in this class, and the knowledge that you have will be useful to pass, because at the end there is a circle, sometimes it does two. Write a program on a piece of paper on the wheel, but you can have your computer turned on. The only advantage of these classes is that then you can improve the circle even 4 times, because in general the guy scores, but max on 3.0. __label__meta_amb
The doctor is a servant and you can't get along too well with her, she knows her own and that's it (no settlement). You have to prepare yourself for the meetings and then ask the whole classes under the board. She gives a small introduction to the next classes (or rather rewrites the tasks from the card). There is not much to learn from it. According to your doctor's consultation, quoted " __label__meta_minus_m
It requires a lot, but it is very honest and student friendly. It is worth going for consultations. He appreciates the progress and commitment. I recommend. __label__meta_plus_s
Courses: Analysis 1 , Analysis 2 , Algebra 1 . (all exercises, people after the lecture I see have some misconceptions) For me no. 1 (which will not say 50% of the group that has failed) [ / b ] Generally very cheerful, very well aimed at students. However, demanding and always fails at least 40% of people . I advise you to think, if someone is going to do nothing and not go to classes, it is better to choose someone else. __label__meta_plus_m
He was 100 % of 'em in her class, he tried his best to catch up with the group because he didn't pass the English language exam and found 'em at B 1 . It was a little hard for me and at the end of 3 . I judge it as + / - because on B 1 e had em a better woman who somehow took better care of her and led the class better. Aha the book to learn this subject is very important . Baka recommended a bad book . I recommend English File . __label__meta_amb
: and yes and no : if there is an opportunity to subscribe to someone else Strange type . Nice, nice at first. He translates very well and that's his plus. Unfortunately, with the credit of the drawings is worse: evil : At the beginning he credits the drawings and is an eye, but this is only an illusion. After a few more, he attaches himself to small things: a table etc . It shows the errors and should be corrected . When you correct them and bring them in the next time, it looks for you next mistakes, and what you've corrected for good is wrong and was supposed to be like it was in the beginning. You have to go for a consultation, my record is to sit down with a couple of 9 hour drawings in his sandwich. I wouldn't recommend it, unless someone likes to cloak. __label__meta_minus_s
Semi-tubes Laboratory Evaluation - no better person! ! ! This lady is really a Golden Woman - nice, student friendly, she will explain, understand, etc, etc ; ) A card while they are at every class but they don't always have to be - a good argument of the group is enough, e.g. in 3 days' time it's Christmas or that the theog hasn't been to the lecture and one or more cards are lost; ) I recommend ! ! ! __label__meta_plus_m
Baka B . English B 1 Evaluation : It is OK : ) [ / b ] In a semester he does 2 or 3 tests not too difficult not too easy (gives the exact scope of each test), moreover, he writes various short essays, and one more thing you have to read a book (about 50 pages) in English and tell it at the consultation for assessment, It gives a 100 % attendance and activity in the class increased grade so that if you go out 5 it gives 5, 5 (it's worth going to all classes), no one will be harmed by the grade, it gives the possibility to improve each test, makes cards (often announced). __label__meta_plus_s
Algebra with Analytical Geomatics 1 Electric 1 lecture started with the words " Jeze l __label__meta_plus_m
I know from a good source that the Doctor generally follows the principle that it is better for a student to learn well on one wheel than a little bit (so to pass) on two wheels. It is better to know something well than a few things, but a little bit. . . Besides, he tries to teach in such a way that people in particular faculties can use it. I.e. when they are mechanics, they do not try to go too deep into the mazes of mathematics, but they teach in such a way that they can use it in the future! ! ! __label__meta_plus_s
Too stiff - too boring, in addition - 5 questions (no surprises); judging from the fact that it counts on creativity rather than on what is being achieved - own invention is welcome. General assessment: nothing terrible __label__meta_plus_s
The doctor is nice and friendly, tries to help students, has a lot of knowledge and is happy to share it. For labs only to her: mrgreen : [ / b ] __label__meta_plus_m
Krystyna's leotard, Dr. Comenius and Expression Evaluation: It will go [ / b ] Despite the rather encouraging name itself the lecture is a little disappointing. She gives out lists of attendance at every class, but I don't remember her taking them into account when making a grade. To get a pass, you have to write two "circles". , __label__meta_amb
I agree with my predecessors. Dr. Kornel is a very original character. He introduces humanism to the teaching of mathematics, tries to teach the theoretical basis in an extremely interesting way. He tries to explain to everyone. . . . .and how he makes examples is often very cosmic. . . . .but it shows that mathematics is not automatics, that you have to think! But when it comes to science. . . .there's a lot you can't learn with Cornel. At least it's not like you can count everything and so on. I wouldn't recommend it for the more ambitious ones, but in fact, if somebody is walking on the most difficult line of resistance, I recommend it! As a colleague has already mentioned, Korni seems twisted and living in a strange world, but the fact that someone pulled down at once will detect! Once upon a time also for an exercise. We added 2 people to the list, Kornel took the list, he didn't even look at the number of people. . . ...and suddenly he burned out as if nothing had happened. . . " __label__meta_plus_m
how to do the application is only for this gentleman : D __label__meta_plus_m
The lecture was conducted in an interesting way, Dr. Chodak is a very nice person, you can learn a lot during classes. He does not need to be present. The credit is based on a business plan or a paper. The scale of paper grades ( quotes ): " works and good __label__meta_plus_m
Course : Human physical environment 4 , 5 ( scale 1 - 5 ) [ / b ] The lectures are prepared in Power Point. From time to time he plays some movies. Sometimes he makes a simple paper on the lecture (this is also an automatic check for presence) . The points from the cards are added to the points from the pass colloquium . The circle is a selection test . Unfortunately, there are detailed questions on it . If you attend the lecture and note down the information that the doctor points out, you will pass in the first approach. Then there is a correction term and an individual question (for which you have to learn a given department from its script). __label__meta_plus_s
COURSE : LINEAR AND ANALYTICAL ALGEBRA 1 VERY NICE MAN ALTHOUGH NOT VERY UNDERSTANDABLE AT FIRST. HE HAS A LITTLE BIT OF A FUNNY PRONUNCIATION, BUT WITH TIME HE WILL GET USED TO IT. COLLOQUIA: AVERAGE DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY . IT IS NOT BAD TO BE STRESSED OUT DURING THE EXERCISES: D AND EVEN THE HUMOUR IS GUARANTEED: D __label__meta_plus_m
Mrs. Ostasiewicz is one big mistake. She lives in a completely different world, you can trample her because she walks in the corridors reading books, and by the way, I'm surprised that she hasn't fallen under a tram yet. . . It is b. unfair in judging (on the lap of 3 tasks, 2 on passing there is no care grade, you can have either 5.0 or 3.0 or 2.0, 3.0 puts those who know little and those who do not like and know a lot) ...can't explain too well many physical issues. . . ACCESS __label__meta_minus_m
If you don't pass in circles it's worth to go to the consultation not to give up, I'll give you another appointment. And if you had something written down, you'll pass me because of that: " __label__meta_plus_m
DOC . KRZYSZTOF ROHLEDER PHYSICAL II LECTURE [ / b ] Lecture in Physics II had em with doc . Rohleder and I'm really impressed with the knowledge of this Lord. . . . . . Full of perfectionism, but so far I don't know when doc . . . Rohleder was taking his breath away during the lecture when he spoke in one sequence. . . ; ) And in addition, he was perfectly prepared to conduct classes. . . . At the beginning of the second part of the lecture he always told us jokes, which relaxed the physical atmosphere. . . . And the crowds during his lectures. . . . . No poetry. . . . . Admittedly, at the end there is a test exam 15 questions seem (good answer +1 , bad answer -0 , 5) and one problem question, e.g. . describe what is the Compton phenomenon . . . . I recommend ! 8 ) __label__meta_plus_m
Maybe it can be the use of computers, the guy is hopeless, he can't run a class, you do everything by yourselves and don't be late because he's late, so if you know you're late, don't even come because it's not worth it anymore. It is not difficult to pass and the tasks are easy but the guy is very annoying and ... . __label__meta_plus_s
Has anyone heard the saying that if you pass the wire, you pass the study, and when you pass the layouts, the student knows when he will graduate? Yes, and that's true. Mr. Balik is strange and do not try to talk to him. Here too, you have to put your weight on it. Subject and lecturer are heavy. Lately one has been so good. To pass the subject you only need to count the first circle ( are 2 ) . It is best to pass the first circle on at least 3 or 5 . Then, without talking, the subject will be pushed forward. __label__meta_minus_s
General : teacher full of mouth ! ! ! ! He has a great attitude towards his work and students. Problems and issues presented very clearly. It's a pity that there are no more of them. __label__meta_plus_m
The majority of the tasks are done in a script, and if not, some crap is not known from where, hopeless sometimes! In class, however, she likes to play on the phone, she also happens to be a hard woman to get along: (Algerbra and she is not a nice memory! We didn't do a lot on the coils because she was still busy with her phone and she didn't explain the tasks because she said there was no time and on the board the easiest thing we did was to do, and on the wheel she gave us a task which most of us didn't understand, and which she said she won't and won't explain because playing on the phone was more important! ! The pass is sometimes not difficult (sometimes it depends on the group on wheels because the tasks are very different) but you can get quite upset as my group on it! ! ! ! Cry : : : ( I've had enough of it ! __label__meta_minus_m
Course: Computer Science 1 Laboratories Evaluation: Run away Scary linden, I strongly advise against. With a pass, it's hard, because project topics suck, nothing helps, and requires a lot. Also do not sign up for it: ) __label__meta_minus_m
Zacharewicz Marianna Course : Prak . kom . BDB + [ / b ] The woman runs a great course ! ! Self-confidence increases for every student who has attended it. It is a human being who has to speak and do something, so I don't recommend it if someone sets a good grade for the presence. But if you put some work into the classroom and practice, what you have done will be appreciated - the efforts will be appreciated - there will be a good evaluation, but there will also be consequences (most people after this course change a little and look more courageously into the future). If someone wants to take their life in their hands and do something good for themselves - I highly recommend it! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! __label__meta_plus_m
Opinion on the basis of the course of fluids I On the faculty : IŚ Way of conducting classes : understandable Can he teach ? Yes Basis of assessment in the index / pass/fail: exam - test (42 questions, a - b - c) Unexpected: no sense of humour General approach to the student: neutral Lectures are for copying, and only this is required, it is also good to work out the questions from previous years, 3 times check attendance during the semester, 1 attendance = 1 good answer to the exam, if one learns it will pass without any problem __label__meta_plus_m
Exercises with this lady are a bit long, the requirements are probably not particularly high, although in the course of a semester you have to pass all the sheets, write all the works and pass one colloquium. There is a bit of that. . . . .the plus is that you don't have to go to all the classes - I was 'em more or less halfway. When you give a grade, you seem to look at the presence, but you don't really lower it down too much. __label__meta_amb
Computer Science 3 - Laboratory Assessment : Ok Mr. Bogdan is a very cultured, forgiving and student friendly man ! ! ! You have to go to classes because you have to give back what you've done on them, which can sometimes save you from being denied or increase your grade! ! ! You can always talk to him and ask him! ! ! It is based on the points from the programs, which are evaluated with a huge delay; / The final evaluation of the bilge from the puknches and is usually raised by 0.5 ; ) However, I would like to warn you that it's a good idea to go for the evaluation when the doctor is in a good mood or has some kind of a foreign species, i.e. to ask some questions so that he doesn't get into something in some program that was written 3 bellows earlier ; ) __label__meta_plus_m
COURSE : FUNDAMENTALS OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY EVALUATION : VERY VERY MUCH . . . . RECOMMEND! ! ! GREAT! ! ! The professor is very nice, nice and helpful. You can take really good notes from her: ) It's all arranged. The wheels are quite simple : ) What's so much to say here is great : lol : and only a fool wouldn't sign up for it : mrgreen : __label__meta_plus_m
Infa 1 lab Calm, forgiving - for newcomers - just right - smiling, I don't want to explain; ) He rather improves what is bad - he assesses justly - sometimes he pulls - he did not make a card, when he scores, he does not ask for each line but only ". __label__meta_plus_s
Algebra with GA very good On the lecture he writes on the board at the rate of a tornado, you can barely keep up. But it's always funny, because of the stories told by the doctor: and this is about the Russian math books that she bought on the market for a copy, and this is about a student who passed Algebra 16 times and had a green Iroquois, and that can of beer, non-alcoholic of course: mrgreen : It must be as shaped as it is now, because it's a golden line, etc. D Explains clearly, if someone does not understand something, he will repeat . It allows you to improve one of the colloquia, usually the one that went worse for the student. After the 2nd exam date, he will ask for the points in case of a failure, he will pull up the grade somewhere and add points there. Generally speaking, oki, student friendly, has a huge amount of knowledge that he wants to pass, but you can see that he's been sitting too long in this math: the wine: . Anyway, as she told us at the first lecture that algebra is her second love or something like that: ) I generally recommend : ) __label__meta_plus_m
there is no better guide ! ! The lectures are very interesting in terms of course name. No regulation in the lectures are just examples of life, it is really worth going because there are a lot of interesting things and I won't say, but I haven't seen so many people on any other humour even though they haven't checked any list! It's worth it because you can find out a few interesting things. __label__meta_plus_m
Scharoch Paweł , Dr. General Physics I and II ( Physics in English ) I recommend [ / b ] Against the background of the rest of the leaders dr . Scharoch is really great. He can be interested in his lecture even though they are at very late hours. The lectures are available in the photocopier and in the Internet. Many experiences . To make the students curious, he tells a joke. Very, but she is a very nice person. Open to students. The same is not a major problem, although for the second semester of physics a lot of people have had a correction of the exam (anyway, he asks you to fail - until you pass) you have to have 30% of 10 questions. The exam can be written in Polish, but English is preferred. Exercises are monotonous (they end at 21 so you have to be understanding). The pass pass column of the exercises looks as follows. You get 3-4 tasks which were most often done on exercises and you have to do 30%. I generally recommend it with all my heart! ! ! __label__meta_plus_m
You're a little old-fashioned, so you've got some rules to follow. Namely, she has a specific idea for the report and it is better to render it according to a specific pattern. The best thing to do when you get the first returned report is to go to the consultation and ask how it should look like, and then correct as suggested - a guarantee that by the end of the lab everything will be accepted without any problems (note - the first two must be done manually, the rest on the computer). Questions during the lab can be heavy, you can fly out at the very end of the lab, but as a rule 3, maybe 4 groups will be asked during the whole class. When you get a pass, it is worth to be graded higher - a good chance of success. __label__meta_amb
I had a network with her and no problem, 5 for the village, and it's all right! ! We were supposed to get warmed up later on, at the beginning of the 5 field games and try to pinch, on the 2 sides 2 is put out (they change) and the rest are looking for balls and pinch or block, for a short time also gives, then matches like 18 people are for 3 teams and up to 15 matches to the end, mostly a few matches and the last match who loses the net, because we had the last one. For every absence, the score goes down by half: ) __label__meta_plus_m
You can sleep like most humanoids, full of ease with no problems, and it's not worth going because nothing will come out of it anyway but time is lost! ! Believe me, I was 2 times on the first and last entry and I said 2 more sentences and I have 5, 5. __label__meta_plus_s
As the foreword already mentioned - a lot of issues for the exam and in practice only simple thermodynamics, and to those who were unsuccessful the professor made an additional date, then some of those who were unsuccessful were on the question and some had 3 dates - that is to say, as for the EAD a great approach to students: ) __label__meta_plus_m
Dr. Seredynski typically leads the exercises from script to script after the task unless, in his opinion, they are not very interesting and he jumps (and according to him, many are not very interesting). . . To the talbica of the task goes to do the student who will report, if not Dr. Seredynski solves the task himself 8 ) Rather, the man is more out of the fact that he himself is sitting at home with the script, but it is worth taking notes because often on the wheels move more interesting - harder tasks, which later may be on the wheel Basis of the pass - positive pass of two wheels. . . If you make the tasks from the script, you don't have to be afraid of the wheels. . . . .unless the bad weather affects the mood of the aliens, it will give cosmic tasks - in his opinion trivial: roll: Nothing of the kind. It is not for nothing called Jasie Beans. . . . .he often throws jokes and stories about which he practically laughs himself. . .) . . . . .or as you sometimes think and stand head to wall for 30 seconds. . . . . . .full blast 8) Friendly, doesn't make problems,, reliable knowledge and so much Positive __label__meta_plus_s
I also recommend. It's very cool, just go to the board (tasks from the list) and he already likes you, very positive guy, he even gave us a cell number that if we have a problem with the task, we have to call. Once he even solved an incomprehensible task at home, he scanned and emailed us. The sentences on the wheel are very similar to those on the lists, he doesn't like to be taken off, but he's fine even if he catches on. He didn't pass only 1 boy, who was entitled to it. I highly recommend it! ! ! __label__meta_plus_m
Mathematical analysis 1 I do not recommend a monotonous lecture, even boring . Constantly writing a theory (which is better to learn at home) - there is no theory on wheels! ! . There is no theory on the wheels! And his sweet pine, somethinginus. __label__meta_minus_s
Mr. Arcadius usually lets everyone through without much trouble. Unfortunately, he has problems with going to classes. I don't mind - I have the same problem ; ), but he could have a little less of a problem with the students ; ) Examinations usually do not belong to the easiest ones, but he still lets them pass. __label__meta_plus_s
The lecture and exercises are clear . Bogdan is a positively twisted man . With the credit for the problems, there is nothing you can do. I highly recommend. __label__meta_plus_m
Every 2 - 3 weeks, he makes cards which forces him to work systematically. B . explains well if you don't know something, ask for sure it will explain it to you. If it is about getting credit, follow him and he will give you. : ) __label__meta_plus_m
A boring lecture . Basically, the same topics are repeated over and over again . Credit: no problem . Who's first that 5 , 5 : ) then getting lower and harder . You download the ref from the net, you read, the doctor interrupts, asks one question to the subject. You answer: 5 , you do not answer: 4 . __label__meta_amb
The way the classes are conducted: you go to exercise to practice what you have to know. The tasks are made out of a list, or you make up your mind from space, make cards, but not always easy. Can he teach? Definitely not. : : ! Passing: cards + circles on the lecture (well, that was arranged by somebody else: roll: Unexpected: announced, not too simple Feeling of humor: no General approach to the student: dst . General assessment : Avoidance : x : x __label__meta_minus_m
I completely agree with the opinion of my colleague from W - 7 . The lectures were conducted in an understandable way, all announced 4 sheets of paper 2 giants, the difficulty actually average __label__meta_plus_s
Shatkowski Jan, PhD Physics h 2 can be [ / b ] at the end there is a text, issues in a - 0 + to read his lectures it's not gonna be like that in my case. he likes to experiment so it is different with these giants I have been trying to get through to a small number of people not knowing H 2 lectures are boring no need to walk __label__meta_plus_s
